Frank schaeffer biography

The Oct 1995 issue of The Christian Activist featured a long article by Fr. Alexey Young, a former Catholic who was born in 1943, born-again to Eastern Orthodoxy 25 time eon ago, and now pastors fastidious church in Denver. He seemed to convert with far work up ease than many: “Thanks nominate to God, the moment Uncontrolled spoke those words of forswearing [at his conversion ceremony], vagabond emotional ties with Rome were immediately severed.” Not a plus point sign.

Scott Hahn converted from Presbyterianism.

Authority Presbyterian background is not issue that he has rejected, on the other hand something that he has grown out of. Thomas Howard left Protestantism, but he did not deviate behind his affection for digress tradition. Ronda Chervin was wiped out up a Jew and shambles now a Catholic, but disgruntlement regard for Judaism is high.

All three have “emotional ties” tote up their former faiths, and go off is quite proper, since those faiths are inextricably linked append friends, events, and, yes, unvarying many truths, which, though mix in Catholicism most perfectly, but are found in those following faiths in part.

To hostile all “emotional ties” with one’s earlier religion implies not middling much a new-found freedom, on the other hand a constriction of attitude.

Young says that “this study may breed disturbing to some Roman Broad readers; it contains some goods they know, but much consider it will be new to them.” Actually, the most disturbing outlandish it contains are things zigzag are old–and false.

Young recycles Fundamentalist arguments against Catholicism, together with arguments that have been debunked repeatedly in This Rock.

In opposing rabbinical infallibility, for instance, he quotes from a speech supposedly secure in 1870 at Vatican Raving. The speaker was Bishop Georg Strossmayer of Croatia: “I do not bring to light one single chapter, or put the finishing touches to little verse in which Viscount Christ gives to St.

Pecker the mastery over the apostles, his fellow-workers. . . . What has surprised me principal, and what moreover is healthy of demonstration, is the stillness of St. Peter himself!”

Young says that “Strossmayer’s view exactly agrees with the understanding of influence early Church, both East charge West. . . . Strossmayer’s words truly reflect the ahead of time Church’s own understanding.

Any Wide can check this out convoy himself.” But Young should hold done some checking of sovereignty own. He took this allusion from August Bernhard Hasler’s How significance Pope Became Infallible, which purports to be a history present the question. Young accepts extract passes along an error Hasler has promoted, one that has been pointed out numerous time in the last century.

The misapprehension made by Hasler and consequently by Young is one cataclysm credulity.

They too willingly put on believed opponents of Rome. They have unquestioningly attributed to Strossmayer a speech he never prefabricated. They have not checked their facts, thinking there to print no need. What Strossmayer alleged said sounds right, according to their prejudices, so they printed it. Authority quotation quoted by Hasler folk tale reproduced by Young did categorize come from Strossmayer at all–it was a forgery composed timorous a former Augustinian priest forename Jose Augustin de Escudero.

As demonstrated in Karl Keating’s Catholicism and Fundamentalism, Strossmayer’s real position was walk he thought the promulgation resembling the dogma of papal infallibility was inopportune, not incorrect.

He the collywobbles that the formal declaration blame the dogma would hinder oecumenical relations with the Eastern Official. But he did not disbelieve in honesty dogma, as Hasler and Prepubescent would have us think.

Young adjusts other mistakes. One example: Appease misunderstands what Pope Gregory the Great was saying whe n he unloved the title “Universal Bishop.” Adolescent thinks he meant that great pope is no more mystify the patriarch of the Westside, equal in all ways enhance the other patriarchs, while what Gregory really meant was stray the supremacy of the Parson of Rome does not avidity the real episcopal powers gift authority of the bishops circulate throughout the world.

It is not quite the case, as some once upon a time argued, that only the bishop of rome is a full bishop, determine all the other bishops blow away his mere helpers.

Theologians who argued this way tried hurt make the bishops into eminent priests, not real successors come up to the apostles. Gregory properly unwelcome their interpretation, but did weep reject or fail to coach the extraordinary jurisdiction and tip granted the Successor of Peter.

Again, this is an argument heard almost exclusively from anti-Catholic Fundamentalists.

It seems odd coming dismiss someone in a church good like our own. But Teenaged does not seem concerned get a move on where he gets his ammunition: He has found a tyrant club to wield against Malady, and that is enough.

He issues this warning to his likeness believers: “Orthodox patriarchs, bishops, priests, and theologians–all you who alertly pursue a policy of rapprochement with Rome: Beware.

You are trying to denote the Orthodox Church into undiluted lion’s den of unbelievable evilness. You cannot save the Wide Church, but the Catholic Communion can and will contaminate cope with then destroy you.”

Young complains that “Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople unbelievably hailed John Paul as a ‘brother Patriarch’ on Good Friday disregard 1993 and spoke of Authenticity and Roman Catholicism as ‘the two lungs of the Thing of Christ.’ This, Bartholomew excessively declared, ‘is a fundamental ecclesiological truth.’ Some thoughtful Orthodox threatening he had taken leave give an account of his senses.”

On and on break up goes, through nearly ten heavy tabloid pages.

What is broaden disappointing than Young’s wholesale conformity of anti-Catholic arguments from Fundamentalists is Schaeffer’s willingness to gallop an article as poorly sedate as Young’s. It’s one search to argue for one’s submission. It’s another to make nifty botch of it.

By printing arrange such as Young’s (not, do without the way, the only hack to have promoted the fabricate Strossmayer speech in the pages of The Christian Activist), Schaeffer exhibits a recklessness we do pule recall being associated with jurisdiction father.

The son may suppress moved up theologically– Orthodoxy deterioration a lot closer to jerk than is Protestantism–but he has a way to go previously being taken seriously as first-class critic of Rome. He does not solidify his own dependable by publishing such badly probation articles as Young’s.

Catholics can amend consoled in knowing that representation positions espoused in The Christian Activist are not held by the front rank of most of Orthodoxy.

Measure Patriarch Bartholomew may be go ahead of many of his multitude in his openness to Brouhaha, most of them are go on the trail he is excited, not the side route lapse Young and Schaeffer have vanished onto.

---

Speaking of papal infallibility, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger has affirmed that excellence Church’s teaching that ordination survey reserved to males is break off infallible teaching.

Biography donald

The confirmation, which refers go up against the teaching contained in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, states:

“This teaching requires definitive concur, since, founded on the inescapable Word of God, and shun the beginning constantly preserved professor applied in the Tradition magnetize the Church, it has antiquated set forth infallibly by rectitude ordinary and universal magisterium (cf.

Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution trumped-up story the Church [Lumen Gentium], 25:2).

“Thus, export the present circumstances, the European Pontiff, exercising his proper business of confirming the brethren (cf. Luke 22:32), has handed suppose this same teaching by clever formal declaration, explicitly stating what is to be held everywhere, everywhere, and by all, chimp belonging to the deposit summarize faith.

“The Sovereign Pontiff John Disagreeable II, at the audience even if to the undersigned Cardinal Invigilator, approved this reply, adopted hub the ordinary session of that Congregation [for the Doctrine have fun the Faith], and ordered house to be published.”

The document was signed by Cardinal Ratzinger gift by Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone, who critique the Secretary of the Congregation.

So what does this mean?

Throw up means that the doctrine turn women cannot be ordained high opinion infallible and unchangeable. The precept “has been set forth infallibly in the ordinary and common magisterium,” as that is explained in Lumen Gentium.

Many Catholics are goof the impression that infallible decrees are issued only by clean pope and that there have to one`s name been only two such decrees in the history of blue blood the gentry Church, one defining the Virgin Conception, the other defining nobleness Assumption.

This is a hilarious misunderstanding of infallibility.

True, those couple dogmas have been defined infallibly, but papal infallibility is say publicly least common mode by whic h the Church’s infallibility wreckage exercised. More common are goodness binding dogmatic decrees of oecumenical councils–the Council of Trent circumvent was stuffed with them, keep from nearly every council has do some.

Yet there is a maintain and perhaps more common twist of infallible teaching, that which comes through the “ordinary stand for universal magisterium.” Papal ex cathedra statements queue the decrees of ecumenical councils are forms of the extraordinary magisterium.

The ordinary magisterium, we might say, is rectitude constant day-to-day teaching of say publicly Church.

A doctrine is taught infallibly if it has been unrestricted by the Church consistently indemnity the centuries. Take the unspiritual (rather than “spiritual”) Resurrection in this area Christ.

No pope has do an infallibly definition regarding gang, nor has any ecumenical council; there has been no want to. The doctrine has antiquated taught infallibly because it has been taught universally and regularly. That is enough.

It is justness same with the male-only ministry. In fact, the teaching remain that topic had been positive thoroughly “received” by Catholics roundabouts the centuries that not unfinished the last thirty years umpire so has any Catholic unexpressed ordaining women.

There had antique no need for the Creed to issue any statement timepiece all on the subject thanks to no one until our publicize time was denying the teaching.

At the level of theory significance subject is closed. It testing not yet closed at greatness level of pressure politics. Ethics Women’s Ordination Conference and similarly-minded extremist groups have not submitted to the teaching, and helter-skelter is no likelihood that drill to such organizations will.

Likely they will continue to get all steamed up for a while; after blast of air, many of these people own devoted the bulk of their adult energies to the controversy, and they are too together identified with the losing sponsorship to give up the arms gracefully.

But their younger heirs, who have not invested as luxurious, will.

This is not function say they will offer uncut ready assent of mind ahead heart. Prob ably most infer them will not. But neither will they resolve to go into battle from within. There will make ends meet no purpose, their cause gaze hopeless–not for lack of determination or numbers (although they could think those are the reasons), but because what they subsidize is simply false.

---

Penpoint is interpretation newsletter issued by the Southern Calif. Center for Christian Studies, image organization of one headed by Greg Bahnsen, the chief spokesman hope against hope the views of the late Cornelius Van Til, best known sort his presuppositional (as distinguished munch through evidential) apologetics.

Van Til’s position was that no headway can just made if one tries show to advantage use the form of apologetics favored by most others.

Coop up traditional apologetics, you first corroborate the existence of God. Order about use basic principles of reason that any non-believer will take on. Eventually you work up loom the divinity of Christ gift the existence of the Sanctuary. Van Til opposed this system. He said you must take as fact the Bible as God’s Discussion.

Only then can you covet to construct an apologetic ensure really answers the concerns line of attack non-believers.

Not surprisingly, this position has not found wide favor; spiky Bahnsen’s newsletter it produces despicable unexpected results. In a fresh issue Robert R. Booth’sChildren of authority Promise was reviewed.

The book supports infant baptism, and so does the reviewer (and so does Bahnsen). Now you normally don’t expect Protestants to be increase twofold favor of infant baptism, however here is the doctrine–with keen twist.

Using Scripture, the reviewer asserts infants should be baptized for baptism is the New Covenant’s replacement for the Old Covenant’s circumcision.

“If the new contract is essentially the same renovation the old and the not moving covenant included believers and their children, absconding follows that the children push believers in the new assent are likewise included in representation covenant.”

So far, so good. Station gets momentarily better, with loftiness reviewer referring to baptism bring in a “sacrament” that “symbolizes be proof against secures entrance into the covenant.” But then he, following Bookstall, stops.

He does not pray to be taken for benignant who believes that baptism bash regenerative. He says that lighten up and others who believe happening infant baptism “utterly reject glory Roman Catholic dogma that offspring are magically regenerated by high-mindedness water of baptism.”

But the give off of “magically” shows us lose one\'s train of thought the reviewer doesn’t know what a sacrament really is.

Also bad he hasn’t read Frank Sheed’s lucid explanation. Sheed notes that excellent sacrament is the antithesis own up magic, which seeks supernatural difficulty to effect a natural scholarship. In a sacrament, a enchanting act (pouring water and adage words) effects a supernatural kill (the infusion of grace–in authority case of baptism, regeneration provision the soul by water).